Pfizer to pay $34 million settle charges of improper marketing
Pharma Compliance Alert, April 4, 2007
Pfizer will pay $34.7 million to settle separate allegations of off-label marketing and improper inducements by two Pharmacia subsidiaries, the company reported this week. Pfizer acquired Pharmacia in 2003, and both settlements involve the human growth hormone Genotropin.
One subsidiary, Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc, will plead guilty to one count of offering an outside vendor a contract to manage a Genotropin patient assistance program in exchange for recommending the purchase of Pharmacia medicines. The other subsidiary, Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC, has entered into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement with the Department of Justice regarding the off-label marketing of Genotropin.
Pfizer distanced itself from the actions of both of these subsidiaries, saying in a statement that the illegal activities occurred before it acquired Pharmacia. Pfizer also pointed out that it discovered and voluntarily reported the off-label marketing before it acquired Pharmacia, and notes that the Department of Justice has acknowledged this.
Allen Waxman, Pfizer's senior vice president and general counsel said in the statement that "Pfizer's marketing and promotion practice are not involved in the settlement," adding that the company has controls to prevent this kind of activity.
Read more about the settlement on Pfizer's Web site.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
