Merck affiliate settles Ohio pricing litigation for $952,925
Pharma Compliance Alert, December 6, 2006
Dey, L.P, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, will pay $952,925 to settle a pricing suit brought by the State of Ohio, the Napa, California company announced November 28.
Dey has also agreed to donate respiratory drugs to certain Ohio health care centers serving underserved populations for four years.
According to DEY, the suit is an unintended consequence of the Government's reliance on a Average Wholesale Price-based model for computing Medicaid reimburesment. "For more than three decades, the Federal and State governments have known about the AWP-based reimbursement model, understood its limitations, and accepted its use as a way to gain the voluntary participation of pharmacists and other healthcare providers in the public healthcare entitlement program Medicaid. The 'spread' between dispensers' acquisition costs and Medicaid reimbursements provided the mechanism whereby pharmacists and other healthcare professionals could recapture their actual dispensing costs," DEY Senior VP of Legal Affairs John Kling says in a statement.
"The problems with the AWP-based reimbursement model are a primary reason why Congress and the Administration reformed the pricing system under the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003. Many in the pharmaceutical industry, including DEY, supported those reforms."
In the last four years, Dey settled similar suits with Connecticut, Idaho, West Virginia, Missouri and Texas.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
