NIH official faces criminal charges for deal with Pfizer
Pharma Compliance Alert, December 6, 2006
A senior NIH scientist is facing up to a year in prison and a fine of $100,000 if convicted of conflict-of-interest charges related to his financial relationship with Pfizer.
Prosecutors say the head of the geriatric psychology branch at the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), Pearson Sunderland, accepted $285,000 in consulting fees and travel expenditures from Pfizer without federal approval, Reuters reports.
Pearson is due to be arraigned in a Baltimore US District Court on December 8.
According to Reuters, Sunderland and NIMH began a five-year Alzheimer's disease biomarker project in 1998, around the same time Sunderland signed a consulting agreement with Pfizer. Between 1998 and 2003, Pfizer paid Sunderland $125,000 in retainer fees and a total of $35,000 to attend 14 one-day meetings at Pfizer facilities. Pfizer also paid Sunderland an additional $125,000 for consulting on an ongoing Alzheimer's biomarker research project.
Sunderland also provided plasma and spinal fluid samples to Pfizer.
Six months ago, Sunderland invoked the fifth-amendment in declining to answer questions from a congressional panel investigating conflicts of interest at NIH.
Prosecutors say Sunderland failed to properly report disclose income from his outside activities or file the required HHS and NIH ethics forms. He is also charged with violating the law barring federal employees from representing an outside party before a government agency.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
