NY Times reports Lilly promoted off-label; Lilly denies claims
Pharma Compliance Alert, December 20, 2006
Eli Lilly promoted off-label uses for the schizophrenia and bipolar disorder drug Zyprexa, The New York Times reported Monday. According to the article, a plaintiff's lawyer representing mentally ill patients supplied The Times with Lilly marketing documents that allegedly detail the Zyprexa promotion. The campaign, called Viva Zyprexa, encouraged sales reps to suggest that physicians prescribe the drug to older patients who showed symptoms of dementia, according to the report.
Eli Lilly objected to the claims. In a statement released Monday, the company said it does not engage in off-label promotion, and has clear guidelines and extensive training to make sure reps only promote FDA-approved information. Lilly also said that the Times failed to mention that the documents cited in the article made up a very small part of the 11 million pages of documents Lilly provided as part of the litigation, and that they do not accurately portray the company's conduct. Lilly called the plaintiffs' lawyer leak "illegal and selective disclosure." Read Lilly's full response here.
A separate New York Times article published Sunday said that Eli Lilly has for a decade attempted to play down the health risks of Zyprexa. That article, too, cited documents supplied by a lawyer representing mentally ill patients. The Times said that Eli Lilly withheld information from doctors about Zyprexa's links to obesity and elevated blood sugar, both diabetes risk factors.
In its response to that article, Eli Lilly countered that it has conducted more than 23 years of research about Zyprexa, and that Lilly, government bodies, and competitors' studies have not found a causal link to diabetes. Read Lilly's full response here.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
