Cardiologists, oncologists, other specialty customers affected by unheralded Medicare cut
Medicare & Reimbursement Advisor Weekly, November 20, 2009
If you have a product prescribed by specialty physicians, consider this: Next year’s Medicare physician pay schedule will likely hurt your specialty provider customers, particularly those in rural communities.
As of January 1, 2010, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) plans to eliminate a series of five-digit CPT codes that specialist physicians, such as cardiologists, oncologists, and surgeons use to bill for medical or surgical consults. These consults occur at the request of a practitioner who wants a specialist’s opinion regarding his or her patient.
“When these doctors find out about this, they are going to go ballistic,” says Larry deGhetaldi, MD, administrator of the Palo Alto Medical Foundation, a multi-specialty group practice with 900 physicians in Santa Cruz, CA. He adds that if it weren’t for the complexity and anxiety over health reform, “this would have been the major freak-out issue.”
Under current CMS rules, the CPT code for consultation calls for reimbursement is between $20 and $50 higher than for a comparable office visit. But by eliminating the CPT codes, those specialists will be forced to bill under a different payment code bracket, which covers for a simple office visit.
The rule change could have an impact on some specialists’ willingness to be available for specialty referral care, either in the hospital or in their office practices, says Ted Mazer, MD, a San Diego–area otolaryngologist.
“The potential impact on already endangered ER call panels should have been considered as well. The devaluation of the consultants’ services may adversely impact access in both city and rural settings,” Mazer says, especially in areas where there is already a shortage of some specialists.
When this change takes effect, Mazer worries that the confusion in what codes Medicare will accept will cause delays in payment, resulting in cash flow problems for specialty physicians as well.
The policy change has come about, in part, because of a desire of the Obama administration to increase reimbursement to primary care physicians, who are increasingly in short supply. But such redistribution may tend to worsen the schism between those groups and specialists.
“Patients in certain parts of the country who undergo a routine hospital admission will have 10 consults,” deGhetaldi says. “If they force this new patient code, that will control some of these costs.”
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Note from Hugh
- Q/A: How should we report irradiated blood products?
- 2014 SNF Proposed Rule Analysis: Revising and rebasing the SNF market basket
- Reminder: MDS correction policy to be updated effective May 19
- Ask the expert: BIMS assessment
- CMS issues transmittal to update the Medicare Provider Reimbursement Manual
- CMS corrects edit 84, deletes modifiers
- Residents say cause of death reporting often inaccurate
- Creative Ways to Trim Nurse Staffing Costs
- CMS looking for comments on molecular pathology payments
- E-mailed
-
- Georgia hospitals scrambling to create residency positions
- Q/A: How should we report irradiated blood products?
- CMS looking for comments on molecular pathology payments
- Tip of the week: Build a successful website to impress candidates
- Joint Commission seeks input on behavioral health home certification
- Don't burn those ICD-9-CM Manuals just yet
- HCA initiative boosts flu shots among hospital workers
- Tip: Keep an eye on evolving molecular pathology codes
- Depressing Leapfrog scores haunt hospitals
- Creative Ways to Trim Nurse Staffing Costs
- Searched