Cardiologists, oncologists, other specialty customers affected by unheralded Medicare cut
Medicare & Reimbursement Advisor Weekly, November 20, 2009
If you have a product prescribed by specialty physicians, consider this: Next year’s Medicare physician pay schedule will likely hurt your specialty provider customers, particularly those in rural communities.
As of January 1, 2010, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) plans to eliminate a series of five-digit CPT codes that specialist physicians, such as cardiologists, oncologists, and surgeons use to bill for medical or surgical consults. These consults occur at the request of a practitioner who wants a specialist’s opinion regarding his or her patient.
“When these doctors find out about this, they are going to go ballistic,” says Larry deGhetaldi, MD, administrator of the Palo Alto Medical Foundation, a multi-specialty group practice with 900 physicians in Santa Cruz, CA. He adds that if it weren’t for the complexity and anxiety over health reform, “this would have been the major freak-out issue.”
Under current CMS rules, the CPT code for consultation calls for reimbursement is between $20 and $50 higher than for a comparable office visit. But by eliminating the CPT codes, those specialists will be forced to bill under a different payment code bracket, which covers for a simple office visit.
The rule change could have an impact on some specialists’ willingness to be available for specialty referral care, either in the hospital or in their office practices, says Ted Mazer, MD, a San Diego–area otolaryngologist.
“The potential impact on already endangered ER call panels should have been considered as well. The devaluation of the consultants’ services may adversely impact access in both city and rural settings,” Mazer says, especially in areas where there is already a shortage of some specialists.
When this change takes effect, Mazer worries that the confusion in what codes Medicare will accept will cause delays in payment, resulting in cash flow problems for specialty physicians as well.
The policy change has come about, in part, because of a desire of the Obama administration to increase reimbursement to primary care physicians, who are increasingly in short supply. But such redistribution may tend to worsen the schism between those groups and specialists.
“Patients in certain parts of the country who undergo a routine hospital admission will have 10 consults,” deGhetaldi says. “If they force this new patient code, that will control some of these costs.”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
