Lilly nears federal Zyprexa settlement
Pharma Compliance Alert, October 29, 2008
Eli Lilly’s total legal expenses for suits relating to its antipsychotic medication Zyprexa could soon top $2.6 billion.
Lilly announced it is nearing a settlement to resolve ongoing investigations led by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania about its marketing practices for Zyprexa at a cost of $1.4 billion.
The federal government began investigating whether Lilly illegally marketed Zyprexa for off-label uses, including dementia and mild bipolar disorder. A total of 41 states and the District of Columbia also launched investigations into the company’s marketing practices. If approved, the settlement would resolve the Zyprexa-related federal claims, as well as similar Medicaid-related claims of states participating in the settlement.
On October 7, Lilly agreed to pay $62 million to 32 states and the District of Columbia to resolve allegations it improperly marketed Zyprexa. Eleven other states that sued over Zyprexa were not covered by the agreement. Lilly has paid $1.2 billion to resolve claims brought by more than 31,000 patients who said they weren’t adequately warned about Zyprexa’s side effects. In March, Lilly and the state of Alaska announced a $15 million settlement in a lawsuit over the use of Zyprexa in the state’s Medicaid program.
Comments
0 comments on “Lilly nears federal Zyprexa settlement ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Q/A: Correct use of modifier -PT
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- "Wall fountains" may be spreading Legionnaires to patients, visitors
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- Searched
