Amgen changes marketing practices for Aranesp
Pharma Compliance Alert, September 3, 2008
Amgen will no longer offer rebates to oncology clinics for their use of the erythropoiesis-stimulating agent Aranesp, according to a New York Times article.
Amgen will also stop offering a discount on Neulasta and Neupogen based on a physician’s purchase of Aranesp. However, Amgen will provide bigger discounts at the time of purchase to physicians who buy at least 50% of their anemia drugs from Amgen.
Critics claim the discounts, which are not unique in the industry, led to overuse of Aranesp, a charge Amgen denies, according to the Times.
Congress has also been investigating Amgen’s pricing practices. In March, Representatives John Dingell (D-MI) and Bart Stupak (D-MI) sent a letter to Amgen to find out whether Amgen discounted its price on Neupogen and Neulasta for physicians who prescribed Aranesp. The lawmakers are concerned “such ‘bundling’ practices have helped fuel excessive and dangerous off-label use of Aranesp.”
In April, Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA), who began investigating Amgen’s rebate practices in 2006, asked the company to explain its drug rebate and discount calculations and why some physician groups received large rebates for purchasing Aranesp
In July, Amgen entered into a $200 million settlement with Ortho Biotech to end a two and a half year antitrust lawsuit over Amgen’s pricing practices.
Comments
0 comments on “Amgen changes marketing practices for Aranesp ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
