Massachusetts governor explains intent of disclosure law
Device Regulation Alert: Safety, Compliance and Reimbursement News, August 18, 2008
Although some life sciences companies are concerned that Massachusetts’ new gift restrictions will hurt their ability to do business in the state, Governor Deval Patrick said that is not the intent of the legislation.
The new law, signed by Patrick August 10:
- Creates an academic detailing program to provide unbiased information to prescribers
- Requires pharmaceutical and medical device companies to disclose payments to healthcare providers valued at $50 or more
- Prohibits certain types of gifts, such as tickets to sporting events
In addition to banning some gifts and requiring disclosure of others, the law calls for the state to develop a code of conduct for industry representatives that includes a $5,000 fine for each violation. Pharmaceutical and medical device companies must also disclose the “nature and purpose” of each payment to physicians.
According to a Boston Globe article, Patrick sent a letter to the state legislature saying the new law is not intended to:
- Force companies to disclose confidential information
- Impede medical research
- Block the training of healthcare providers
Comments
0 comments on “Massachusetts governor explains intent of disclosure law ”
Related Products
-
ePharm5 InDepth
EPharm5 e-mail newsletter delivers the top 5 developments in pharma business innovation, with original research, interviews...
-
Big Pharma Performance Before, During and Beyond the Global Recession
This report assesses the performance of the leading 15 pharmaceutical companies up to, during and beyond the recent global...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched