Bristol-Myers Squibb settlement divided among states
Pharma Compliance Alert, July 23, 2008
Allegations of pricing fraud and marketing violations cost Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) $515 million last year in a settlement with the federal government. Now states are finding out how much their individual cuts will be.
The federal government and state attorneys general began investigation BMS and its former subsidiary Apothecon in 2001. The claims arose from nine separate whistleblower lawsuits and voluntary disclosures by BMS
The settlement with the states resolves allegations including:
- Reporting inflated prices for various prescription drugs, knowing Medicaid and various federal healthcare programs would use these reported prices to pay for BMS and Apothecon products used by their recipients
- Paying illegal remuneration to physicians, healthcare providers, and pharmacies to induce them to purchase BMS and Apothecon products
- Promoting the sale and use of Abilify, an antipsychotic drug, for off-label uses
- Misreporting sales prices for Serzone, an antidepressant, resulting in the improper reduction of the amount of rebates paid to the state Medicaid programs
The settlement involves 43 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal government. In a release, Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum announced the state will receive $21.5 million, while Massachusetts will receive $9.1 million, according to a release from Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley. North Carolina’s share amounts to $14.8 million.
In addition to the federal and state settlements, BMS entered into a corporate integrity agreement.
Comments
0 comments on “Bristol-Myers Squibb settlement divided among states ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
