Senate hears testimony on relationships between device industry and physicians
Device Regulation Alert: Safety, Compliance and Reimbursement News, March 17, 2008
OIG Assistant Inspector General for Legal Affairs Gregory E. Demske detailed the risks associated with financial relationships between physicians and the medical device industry in testimony before the Senate Special Committee on Aging on February 27.
"Financial relationships between the medical device industry and physicians are pervasive and can create both benefits and risks to patients and healthcare programs," Demske said.
He highlighted recent enforcement actions that illustrate how industry payments and benefits provided to physicians can influence their choice of devices. Payments to physicians are often kickbacks, according to Demske. He also criticized the growing trend of physicians owning medical device manufacturers.
Demske said the OIG's enforcement tools include:
- False Claims Act
- Anti-kickback statute
- Administrative sanctions such as Medicare exclusion and the Civil Monetary Penalties Law
The OIG provides guidance to help avoid violations in:
- Advisory opinions
- Fraud alerts
- Bulletins
- Compliance program guidance
The Compliance Program Guidance for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers can help device manufacturers comply with federal law and prevent improper relationships with physicians. Demske also emphasized the need to disclose relationships between physicians and medical device companies.
Comments
0 comments on “Senate hears testimony on relationships between device industry and physicians ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
