Supreme Court deadlocks on Pfizer case
Pharma Compliance Alert, March 5, 2008
Pfizer and its Warner-Lambert division won't get any help from the Supreme Court when it comes to defending itself against 27 lawsuits filed in Michigan over its now-withdrawn Rezulin diabetes treatment, according to Bloomberg.com.
The Court split 4-4 with one justice abstaining in a case about patient lawsuits over federally approved drugs and devices. The ruling sets no national precedent and allows a lower court ruling in favor of the plaintiffs to stand. Twenty-seven people are suing Pfizer, claiming they suffered serious injury as a result of taking Rezulin.
The unique Michigan law at the center of the case generally bars suits against FDA-approved drugs but an exemption in the law does allow injured patients to sue if they allege a drug company committed fraud during the FDA drug-review process.
Pharmaceutical companies will have another day to argue for federal preemption of state lawsuits before the Court in the fall when the justices will hear Wyeth's challenge to a judgment awarded to a Vermont woman over an anti-nausea drug. If Wyeth is successful, the court may bar any suit that questions the adequacy of an FDA-approved packaging insert to ensure drug safety.
Comments
0 comments on “Supreme Court deadlocks on Pfizer case ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Case Management Monthly, June 2012
- Searched
