FDA offers tips for premarket submissions for coronary and carotid embolic protection devices
Device Regulation Alert: Safety, Compliance and Reimbursement News, March 3, 2008
New FDA guidance issued February 15 provides device manufactures with advice on preparing premarket notification submissions for coronary and carotid embolic protection devices that remove substances loosened during interventional procedures.
The guidance provides information for evaluation protocols and developing labeling for the devices. The FDA will use the guidance when it reviews 510(k) premarket submissions for these devices. That means manufacturers would be wise to carefully consider the recommendations in the guidance when preparing their submissions.
In the guidance, the FDA recommends that manufacturers submitting 510(k) applications for the devices:
- Identify the device by regulation and product code
- Describe characteristics and performance specifications.
- Compare the device to existing devices
- Address risks related to use of the device such as device failure, infection, tissue and blood damage and embolization
- Perform biocompatibility testing on devices that have contact with circulating blood for a limited time.
- Test the devices durability and performance
- Submit clinical data from trials of the device or scientifically-based reasoning for why that data isn't necessary
- Include sterilization and labeling information
Comments
0 comments on “FDA offers tips for premarket submissions for coronary and carotid embolic protection devices ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitalist-surgeon comanagement has no effect on outcomes
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Searched
