D.C. passes bill to license pharmaceutical representatives
Pharma Compliance Alert, January 16, 2008
The D.C. Council passed the SafeRx Act of 2007 last week by a 7 to 6 vote, becoming the first jurisdiction in the country to require pharmaceutical sales representatives to obtain a license, according to the Washington Post.
As reported in the December 19 issue of Pharma Compliance Alert, the Act requires pharmaceutical sales representatives to be licensed by the D.C. Board of Pharmacy, be college graduates, follow a code of ethics, and refrain from providing gifts to physicians. The bill allows for a sales representative's license to be revoked if his or her activities are deemed fraudulent.
The section of the bill that banned data mining was removed before the final vote. Data mining laws have faced a tough road. Similar laws on data mining were enacted in Vermont, Maine, and New Hampshire, but the Maine and New Hampshire laws were struck down by the courts. The case involving the Vermont law is currently pending.
The bill adds a requirement for physicians to include new pharmaceutical product and trend information in their continuing education mandates to learn more about the industry, as well as new instructions for the D.C. Health Department to track the effectiveness of the bill from fines collected to number of licensed salespeople after the end of 2010.
According to the Washington Post, pharmaceutical companies say the SafeRx Act is not needed because the industry is already regulated by federal agencies and sales representatives are monitored by the American Medical Association.
Click here to read more in the Washington Post.
Comments
0 comments on “D.C. passes bill to license pharmaceutical representatives ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched
