CMS discusses reason for scrutiny of costs for recalled devices
Device Regulation Alert: Safety, Compliance and Reimbursement News, November 16, 2007
Previously we told you about CMS's focus on healthcare costs related to recalled and replacement devices. CMS expressed concern about recent recalls of devices such as implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds).
In the final rule for the 2008 Physician Fee Schedule, CMS responded to comments addressing recalled and replacement devices. CMS had solicited comments in the proposed rule about how to identify and address the costs Medicare incurs with regard to device recalls. CMS said in the preamble to the final rule that several commenters agreed that such recalls resulted in additional costs, but argued those costs should be borne by the device manufacturers rather than Medicare and other payers. Commenters expressed concern that physicians would be penalized for serving patients affected by recalls.
CMS said it did not intend to penalize physicians caring for patients affected by recalls. Instead CMS said it intends "to ensure that costs of the additional physicians' services and diagnostic tests associated with recalled devices are recognized and appropriately addressed." CMS said it will consider commenters' concerns and suggestions as it develops a plan to address the issue.
To view the final rule, visit the CMS Web site and click the tab for "Newsroom." It will be published in the Federal Register on November 27.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched
