WHO defends response to H1N1 pandemic
Infection Control Weekly Monitor, June 16, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Infection Control Weekly Monitor!
The World Health Organization (WHO) is defending its decisions surrounding the H1N1 pandemic after an article published by the British Medical Journal (BMJ) criticized the organization using pandemic advisors who had done paid work for pharmaceutical companies, raising potential conflict of interest concerns.
Furthermore a statement by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) said WHO’s handling of the pandemic led to a “waste of large sums of public money, and unjustified scares and fears about the health risks faced by the European public.”
WHO defended it’s response to the pandemic, but admitted the agency needs more transparency in listing industry connections. WHO says it already has systems in place to protect against advice that is biased by commercial interests, but publication of relevant interest needs to be more routine and the organization is currently working on updating those systems.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Infection Control Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
-
Patient Safety Monitor
As part of your Patient Safety Monitor membership, you'll receive Briefings on Patient Safety. In this 12-page monthly...
-
Patient Safety Monitor Alert
This e-mail newsletter provides healthcare professionals with the latest patient safety news, while offering useful...
-
Infection Control Manual for the Physician's Office
This book and CD-ROM set describes the steps physicians and their staff should take to protect patients, staff, and the...
-
Emergency Management Coordinator's Handbook for Hospitals
This book and CD-ROM is an affordable, easy-to-read reference that outlines the fundamental processes of emergency...
-
Emergency Management Compliance Manual
This binder and CD-ROM set helps you cut through the confusion related to the new emergency management chapter of the...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Q/A: Correct use of modifier -PT
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- "Wall fountains" may be spreading Legionnaires to patients, visitors
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- Searched