Affecting change in Nevada’s IC regulations
Briefings on Infection Control, October 1, 2009
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login.
Everyone needs a wake-up call now and then. For some, it’s reprimand from your boss. For others, it’s a hepatitis C outbreak that puts 63,000 people at risk for infection.
In Nevada, it was the latter. In February 2008, Nevada health officials revealed unsafe injection practices involving the reuse of syringes and the sharing of single use medication vials between patients at an endoscopy center in Las Vegas. More than 12,000 of the 63,000 at risk patients have been tested for infection. As of October 2008, the Southern Nevada Health District had identified 105 clinic-associated hepatitis C cases, making it the largest outbreak of bloodborne illness in the country.
Everyone needs a wake-up call now and then. For some, it’s reprimand from your boss. For others, it’s a hepatitis C outbreak that puts 63,000 people at risk for infection.
In Nevada, it was the latter. In February 2008, Nevada health officials revealed unsafe injection practices involving the reuse of syringes and the sharing of single use medication vials between patients at an endoscopy center in Las Vegas. More than 12,000 of the 63,000 at risk patients have been tested for infection. As of October 2008, the Southern Nevada Health District had identified 105 clinic-associated hepatitis C cases, making it the largest outbreak of bloodborne illness in the country.
On the plus side, the outbreak forced the state health department into action, says Marla McDade Williams, MPA, bureau chief at the Bureau of Health Care Quality and Compliance at the State Health Division.
“What happened in Las Vegas illustrated that we had disconnects between our public health systems, because the hepatitis C cases themselves were discovered by the Southern Nevada Health District,” Williams says. “They were traced back to a facility that was licensed by us, the Bureau of Healthcare Quality and Compliance at the State Health Division, and we realized at the time the resources we had been devoting to survey and certification functions were inadequate to get to all of the 11 or 12,000 licensed facilities that we have in Nevada.”
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- Tip: Know the common bunionectomy procedure codes and how to use them
- Code changes should help ease the pain when coding for facet joint injections
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Searched
