Affecting change in Nevada’s IC regulations
Briefings on Infection Control, October 1, 2009
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on Infection Control.
Everyone needs a wake-up call now and then. For some, it’s reprimand from your boss. For others, it’s a hepatitis C outbreak that puts 63,000 people at risk for infection.
In Nevada, it was the latter. In February 2008, Nevada health officials revealed unsafe injection practices involving the reuse of syringes and the sharing of single use medication vials between patients at an endoscopy center in Las Vegas. More than 12,000 of the 63,000 at risk patients have been tested for infection. As of October 2008, the Southern Nevada Health District had identified 105 clinic-associated hepatitis C cases, making it the largest outbreak of bloodborne illness in the country.
Everyone needs a wake-up call now and then. For some, it’s reprimand from your boss. For others, it’s a hepatitis C outbreak that puts 63,000 people at risk for infection.
In Nevada, it was the latter. In February 2008, Nevada health officials revealed unsafe injection practices involving the reuse of syringes and the sharing of single use medication vials between patients at an endoscopy center in Las Vegas. More than 12,000 of the 63,000 at risk patients have been tested for infection. As of October 2008, the Southern Nevada Health District had identified 105 clinic-associated hepatitis C cases, making it the largest outbreak of bloodborne illness in the country.
On the plus side, the outbreak forced the state health department into action, says Marla McDade Williams, MPA, bureau chief at the Bureau of Health Care Quality and Compliance at the State Health Division.
“What happened in Las Vegas illustrated that we had disconnects between our public health systems, because the hepatitis C cases themselves were discovered by the Southern Nevada Health District,” Williams says. “They were traced back to a facility that was licensed by us, the Bureau of Healthcare Quality and Compliance at the State Health Division, and we realized at the time the resources we had been devoting to survey and certification functions were inadequate to get to all of the 11 or 12,000 licensed facilities that we have in Nevada.”
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on Infection Control.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- 2010 ICD-9 code updates now available online
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- Master modifiers to ensure accurate reimbursement
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Don’t be scared into silence: Affiliation letter safeguards allow you to disclose more
- Understand the H1N1 Flu and how to code it
- E-mailed
-
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Revised MS.1.20 'huge improvement', out for comment again
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Providers report first RAC denials in Florida, South Carolina
- Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations, December 2009
- Develop effective strategies for your breach notification response program
- Searched
