MRSA legislation could require screening
Infection Control Weekly Monitor, July 1, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Infection Control Weekly Monitor!
New legislation recently introduced in Congress could require hospitals to screen patients for MRSA infections in order to prevent the spread of infection and protect healthcare workers, according to The Press of Atlantic City.
HR 2937, sponsored by Rep. Jackie Speier, D-CA, and S 1305, the bill proposed in the Senate, sponsored by Sen. Robert Menendez, D-NJ, requires hospitals to submit MRSA rates to the public, as well. In the Worker Infection Protection Act, hospitals initially would be required to screen all patients admitted to high risk areas such as the ICU. By 2014 the bill would require hospitals to screen all incoming patients.
The bill would also create a new OSHA standard to protect healthcare workers and first responders, according to PolitickerNJ.com.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Infection Control Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
-
Medical Environment Update
Timely medical compliance news from OSHA, CDC, EPA, and other regulatory agencies!
-
The Infection Prevention Toolkit: Seven-Minute Solutions for Five IC Hotspots
This DVD provides five, seven -minute segments, that cover the most pressing topics in IC prevention.
-
Infection Control Compliance Guide, Third Edition
Infection Control Compliance Guide, Third Edition, is an concise, easy-to-use third edition of a best seller. It's your...
-
The Infection Prevention Handbook
The Infection Prevention Handbook is a core training resource that offers practical references to help infection prevention...
-
Infection Prevention Policy and Procedure Manual for Hospitals
With more than 300 pages, this manual provides worksheets, job descriptions, policies, forms, and other helpful tools for...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- E-mailed
-
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- Tip: Know the common bunionectomy procedure codes and how to use them
- Code changes should help ease the pain when coding for facet joint injections
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- News and briefs: UA study links lack of empathy in residents to long shifts
- Searched