Forge a working relationship with the lab
Briefings on Infection Control, April 1, 2009
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on Infection Control.
The 2009 Joint Commission standard IC.01.02.01 speaks directly to that relationship in element of performance (EP) 2, which requires that hospitals provide laboratory resources to support IC. You can find the standard in the infection prevention and control chapter of the Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals. Because most infection preventionists (IP) are RNs, not microbiologists, they will need to form a continuous and reliable relationship with the laboratory. Joint Commission surveyors will be looking for indicators that this relationship exists.
Upgrading software
IC departments today need information from test results or microorganisms as fast as possible to prevent outbreaks or identify diseases. However, some facilities are still using pencil and paper charting, says Peggy Prinz Luebbert, MS, MT(ASCP), CIC, CHSP, independent consultant and owner of Healthcare Interventions, Inc., in Omaha, NE. Microbiology labs need to improve the process with software that will assist IPs by communicating results faster and more effectively. “I’m working with a long-term acute care [facility] right now, and they are still using chart reviews to look for positive cultures, and it’s just archaic and time-consuming,” says Luebbert. Many IPs, particularly in small facilities, do not realize that most labs already have the technology to report daily summaries of positive cultures electronically—they just need to ask. The Joint Commission (formerly JCAHO) will want IC departments to have access to culture reports. Although purchasing high-tech software isn’t a requirement, it will certainly be something to point to indicating that line of communication exists. Greenville (SC) Hospital has installed software called Safety Surveyor, says Connie Steed, MSN, RN, CIC, director of IC. “It’s sort of like a data miner. There is more immediate access, and we can actually set up alerts,” Steed says.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on Infection Control.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: May we bill an E/M code for a wound care first visit
- Peer Review Monthly: Do you know what I know?
- 2010 ICD-9 code updates now available online
- Omnicare to pay $98 million to settle kickback charges
- Eliminate missed charges, errors to reduce lost revenue
- New, more deadly strain of MRSA found
- Study: Action can be taken to reduce dementia risk
- Understand the H1N1 Flu and how to code it
- Texas Hospital group pays U.S. $27.5 million in false claims settlement
- Tamiflu ® shortage sparks dosing confusion at some facilities
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: May we bill an E/M code for a wound care first visit
- Omnicare to pay $98 million to settle kickback charges
- New, more deadly strain of MRSA found
- Peer Review Monthly: Do you know what I know?
- Eliminate missed charges, errors to reduce lost revenue
- Medicare patients suffer from a medical error every 1.7 minutes
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Study: Action can be taken to reduce dementia risk
- First board certification for hospitalists announced -- with caution
- Experts: Hospitals not the place for personal e-mail, social networking sites
- Searched
