Heads up on Joint Commission news
Infection Control Weekly Monitor, January 7, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Infection Control Weekly Monitor!
This week The Joint Commission changed one of its infection control (IC) standards for 2009, clarifying the responsibilities of the person responsible for the hospital’s IC program. The change is part of a series of revisions as the accreditor prepares to submit its application to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for continued deeming authority for hospitals.
The change is to the element of performance (EP) for standard IC.01.01.01, which requires hospitals identify the individual or individuals responsible for the IC program. For hospitals that use Joint Commission accreditation for deemed status purposes (in other words, to demonstrate compliance with CMS’ Conditions of Participation) the individual with clinical authority over the IC program is responsible for the following:
-
Developing and implementing policies governing control of infections and communicable diseases
- Developing a system for identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases
- Maintaining a log of incidents related to infections and communicable diseases
Click here for more on the changes to the standards.
In good news for hospitals, the Joint Commission also announced in its Joint Commission Online December bulletin that there will be no new National Patient Safety Goals (NPSG) developed for 2010. Instead, over the next year, the Joint Commission will review and update current NSPGs, including numerous IC-related issues. To read more, click here.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Infection Control Weekly Monitor!
Comments
0 comments on “Heads up on Joint Commission news ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- Tip of the Week: Treat faculty orientation like resident orientation
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- E-mailed
-
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- Tip: Know the common bunionectomy procedure codes and how to use them
- Code changes should help ease the pain when coding for facet joint injections
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- News and briefs: UA study links lack of empathy in residents to long shifts
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Correctly code for new cardiac, pulmonary rehab benefits
- Searched
