- Home
- » e-Newsletters
Self-administered drugs may cause trouble
Pharmacy Regulation Resource, October 26, 2005
Hospital outpatient departments are in for a rude shock on the first day of the new Medicare Part D prescription drug plan: Patients complaining that their outpatient self-administered drugs aren't covered under the new benefit.
It's a serious operational and public relations issue, and one that Valerie Rinkle, MPA, revenue cycle director for Asante Health System in Medford, OR, knows all too well. Rinkle has spent the last several months trying to warn the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and her local congressman of the impending problem as the January 1, 2006, deadline approaches, but to no avail.
"Hospitals should anticipate beneficiary phone calls with patient complaints," Rinkle says.
Rinkle says most hospitals will assume that these drugs are an out-of-network benefit, which means the beneficiary pays the hospital, then takes the invoice and sends it to the prescription drug plan to receive reimbursement.
But here's the catch-most hospital invoices read simply "Pharmacy, unit of five, $15," for example, and without detail about the drugs themselves, the prescription drug plan won't reimburse them.
Tip: Develop a letter that prints out each time a Medicare outpatient registers at your facility. The letter should disclose that the self-administered drugs won't be covered.
Rinkle recommends the letter state something to the effect of: "We're excited that you may have elected to enroll in the new Part D Medicare prescription drug plan. Please be aware that our hospital is still obligated to bill you directly for prescription and over-the-counter drugs administered to you during your visit to our hospital. You can file an out-of-network claim to your new prescription drug plan to be reimbursed for these drugs."
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Searched