- Home
- » e-Newsletters
Doctors want company’s involvement in device recalls changed
Ambulatory Surgery Reimbursement Update, June 28, 2005
Following recent high-profile recalls of implants such as defibrillators made by Guidant Corp. and a drug-injection port from Boston Scientific Corp., some doctors are pushing for device-makers to contact affected patients directly, according to The Boston Globe.
The Food and Drug Administration often requires companies with defective products to contact providers, putting the onus on providers to contact patients.
But this process can take time, and patients are sometimes informed of recalls through the news. Doctors in support of requiring companies to contact patients directly say it wouldn't be difficult and would speed up the process.
"We've already seen problems where physicians aren't getting in touch with patients quickly," said Stephen Seller, a Philadelphia attorney who represents a number of patients who received a Guidant device, according to The Boston Globe.
"It wouldn't take a deep or difficult database to send out a card to everyone," said Christopher J. White, a New Orleans cardiologist who last summer dealt with a recall of cardiac stents that affected some of his patients.
However, news of a recall may needlessly worry patients because they are not as informed about the devices as their doctors, said Robert B. Nicholas, a healthcare attorney who represents some medical-device companies.
"You don't want someone to be panicking over these situations, you want them to have a reasonable discussion [with their physician]," said Nicholas, according to The Boston Globe.
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched