- Home
- » e-Newsletters
Docs and patients view clinical trials differently
Physician Practice Advisor, May 18, 2005
Physicians don't view side effects as a decision-making barrier for patients considering experimental therapy, according to a Fox Chase Cancer Center survey.
The study surveyed 478 medical oncologists in Pennsylvania and their patients and results were presented recently at the American Society of Clinical Oncology's 41st Annual Meeting in Orlando, FL. In addition to demographic characteristics, the survey also evaluated practical and psychosocial barriers to clinical trial participation.
"The majority of patients and doctors strongly agreed that clinical trials are important to improving cancer treatment," said medical oncologist Neal J. Meropol, M.D., according to a report in ScienceDaily.com. "However, whereas 79% of oncologists strongly agreed that patients benefit from participating, only 57% of the patients felt strongly that they would benefit."
Of seven possible obstacles to clinical trials, patients cited fear of side effects as the greatest deterrent, whereas physicians ranked that last among psychosocial barriers. Other patient/doctor discrepancies in ranking impediments to clinical trials included:
- lack of trust in medical establishment (doctors ranked 2, patients ranked 6)
- patients' lack of understanding of clinical trials (doctors ranked 4, patients ranked 7)
For more information about the survey, see www.fccc.edu or call 1-888-FOX CHASE.
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched