- Home
- » e-Newsletters
When your hospital demands performance criteria, meet it head on with demands of your own
Radiology Administrator's Compliance and Reimbursement Insider, April 1, 2005
The growing shortage of qualified radiologists is forcing hospitals into direct competition with health plans-and justifying the large salaries and other perks that come with the territory. Today, more hospitals are inserting performance criteria into their contracts with radiologists and proposing benchmarks or goals to measure performance that practices must meet under the terms of the agreement.
Although they have positive aspects, the performance-based criteria also can hammer away at hospital-based radiology practices-many of which are justifiably wary about agreeing to such language in their contracts with hospitals, explains Philadelphia healthcare attorney Joan Roediger, who counts several large radiology practices and medical staffs among her clients.
Some radiology practices are offended by hospitals' attempts to quantify and qualify their performance. So if the hospital you're affiliated with isn't flexible on this point and wants to continue to provide radiology services, you may have to bend your rules. If you're willing to spend time negotiating, you may be able to work out performance criteria that both you and the hospital can live with. You also may be able to add performance criteria that you want the hospital to meet under the contract. We'll explain how to make a hospital's demand for performance criteria work to your benefit.
Performance criteria is probably here to stay
There are several factors motivating the trend toward hospitals inserting performance criteria into contracts with physicians, Roediger says, including the following:
Although it may seem like a reach to think that a radiologist's salary could be considered a private inurement, if the salary is considered excessive for the required duties, it could be construed that way. So hospitals that demand performance criteria are being extra prudent by spelling out exactly what's expected in return for a salary, Roediger says. They also give themselves a way to measure performance against those expectations.
- performing services promptly
- documenting services appropriately
- billing for services correctly (if the practice handles its own billing)
- maintaining productive relationships with treating physicians
- educating medical residents, students, colleagues, and other staff
- caring for patients sensitively
Hospitals likely will want to quantify these demands to give themselves some method of measuring your practice's ability and willingness to pursue these goals, Roediger says. To this end, she has seen contracts in which a hospital attempts to insert clauses that do one or more of the following:
- Require that patients receive radiology services within a certain period after the physician order is entered in the chart.
- Require that tests be interpreted and a report entered in the patient chart within a specified period after the test is performed.
- Demand that charts be subject to, and pass, periodic audits meant to determine adequacy of documentation.
- Demand that billing records be available to the hospital for periodic audits, if the practice handles its own billing.
- Mandate that a certain number of hours per month be devoted to education through teaching clinics, grand rounds, mortality and morbidity conferences, seminars, etc.
- Demand that radiologists participate in a specified number of attempts to market hospital-based radiology services to referring physicians/the patient community.
- Demand that the radiology department achieve a particular score on patient satisfaction surveys. Some of these demands can be couched in terms that may be acceptable for your practice, Roediger says. You may need to reject others outright.
Make performance criteria work for you
If your hospital wants to incorporate performance criteria into, Roediger advises the following:
Make hospital demand benefit you
Here's an example of how you can negotiate a hospital's demand for certain performance criteria: The hospital wants to insert a clause that will obligate your practice to complete interpretive reports and forward them to medical records within 96 hours of a patient's examination. This may seem like a tall order, and maybe it is. Depending on your practice's circumstances, Roediger suggests the following ways to adapt the clause:
Insider says: Depending on your preferences, you may want to personally negotiate your practice's contract with the hospital or have your attorney do it. If you negotiate the contract yourself, it's crucial to have a competent and experienced health law attorney review it before you sign, Roediger says.
Insider source
Joan Roediger, Esq., Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel, LLP, 1617 John F. Kennedy Blvd., 19 th Fl., Philadelphia, PA 19103.
Model language
A. Interpretive reports. Radiology practice shall make its best efforts to complete interpretive reports for 80% of all radiological examinations within four business days of the patient's examination, and to complete all interpretive reports no later than five business days after the patient's examination. Radiology practice will take all necessary steps to ensure that complete interpretive reports are forwarded to the medical records department promptly.
B. Bonusfor exceeding "success rate." The percentage of the total interpretive reports completed and sent to medical records within four business days of the patient's examination shall be termed the practice's "success rate." Should radiology practice's success rate exceed 80% at the end of six months, radiology practice shall be entitled to a bonus equaling [insert amount, e.g., $10,000] for each 5% by which practice's success rate exceeds 80%.
C. Transcription of reports. Hospital agrees that transcription of radiological reports shall be completed and returned to the radiologist within two business days of submission to the transcription department.
1. Radiologist shall notify hospital within one business day should any interpretive reports not be transcribed within the agreed time period.
2. Any such reports not properly transcribed shall not be counted toward the calculation of radiology practice's success rate as that term is defined in paragraph B.
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- 2010 ICD-9 code updates now available online
- Master modifiers to ensure accurate reimbursement
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- Don’t be scared into silence: Affiliation letter safeguards allow you to disclose more
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Understand the H1N1 Flu and how to code it
- E-mailed
-
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Revised MS.1.20 'huge improvement', out for comment again
- Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations, December 2009
- Hand hygiene rates improved through variety of reinforcement styles
- Press Ganey report: Patient satisfaction increasing across the country
- Residency Program Alert, December 2009
- Searched