- Home
- » e-Newsletters
JCAHO won't let pharmacy off easy with goals
Pharmacy Regulation Resource, September 8, 2004
Bar coding and restricting IV preparation to the pharmacy didn't make the final 2005 National Patient Safety Goals, but don't expect them to go away for good.
Despite being left off the final goals list, industry experts still expect hospitals will need to focus on patient-identification technology and IV preparation. Other technologies, including radio frequency identification (RFID), may replace bar coding in the future, and the JCAHO will still survey for compliance with U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP) Chapter 797, which regulates compounding sterile preparations.
Keep an eye on bar coding
Bar coding was the most controversial of the proposed goals. If it passed, the JCAHO would have required hospitals to have bar-coding systems in place to identify patients by January 1, 2007.
The Health Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS), a technology trade group based in Chicago, took an informal Web survey of its members. Only 28% thought bar coding was feasible by 2007, said Ned Simpson, FHIMSS, a HIMSS fellow and principal for global health solutions with Computer Sciences Corp. in Ann Arbor, MI, during the Hospital Pharmacy and Supply Chain Summit in Washington, DC, in July.
Comply with Chapter 797 instead
Even though the JCAHO will not restrict IV preparation to the pharmacy in the new goals, it will survey for compliance with USP 797, which outlines equipment and precautions required-including clean rooms for compounding certain sterile preparations. Clean rooms have special air filters and equipment to create a sterile environment to compound medications.
The JCAHO began surveying for conformity with USP 797 and the corresponding JCAHO standards July 1. The JCAHO will consider organizations compliant for 2004 if they have plans in place to meet the USP requirements.
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched