AHIMA: HHS must standardize minimum necessary definition
HCPRO Website, June 24, 2016
HHS must provide a clearer definition of the HIPAA minimum necessary standard, AHIMA president Melissa Martin, RHIA, CCS, CHTS-IM, testified at a subcommittee hearing.
The National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics’ subcommittee on privacy, confidentiality, and security held a hearing June 16 to determine how HHS can improve its guidance on the HIPAA minimum necessary standard. The minimum necessary standard requires covered entities (CE) to use, request, and disclose only the minimum amount of protected health information (PHI) necessary for a given transaction. CEs cannot use, request, or disclose an individual’s entire medical record unless it can justify that the whole record is reasonably needed for a specific purpose.
However, HHS does not currently offer specific guidance on how the standard should be defined and leaves it largely up to the discretion of individual CEs. The lack of a clear, official definition leads to inconsistent minimum necessary standards among CEs and may cause the unnecessary release of PHI, leaving CEs vulnerable to litigation, according to Martin’s testimony. HHS should develop a clear, objective definition of minimum necessary and consider creating different levels of minimum necessary based on specific indicators.
Technological and regulatory shifts since the minimum necessary standard was first implemented present additional challenges, Martin said. Many EHRs lack the controls HIM professionals require to properly restrict access to an individual’s PHI to only the specific staff that need access to it. Most EHRs also lack the sophistication to perform the complicated search and data sequestration functions CEs require.
The shift to mandate improved and increased interoperability and data sharing among healthcare providers adds an additional challenge to defining the minimum necessary, she said. The minimum necessary amount of PHI needed for most uses and requests has increased rather than decreased.
AHIMA conducted a survey on minimum necessary standards prior to the hearing. A plurality (38%) of respondents said they did not know if their organization adopted a definition of minimum necessary for access and disclosure of PHI.
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Nursing responsibilities for managing pain
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Complications from immobility by body system
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- Skills of effective case managers
- The consequences of an incomplete medical record
- Coding Clinic reiterates guidelines for provider documentation
- E-mailed
-
- Signs, symptoms, and unspecified codes
- Severity of illness: What is it all about and what does it mean for physician profiles, public perception?
- Q&A: Emergency room documentation and radiology reports
- Proctoring conundrums: How to credential an OR observer
- Learn documentation requirement for critical care coding in the ED
- Know the medical gas cylinder storage requirements
- Joint Commission aligns patient visitation rights requirements with CMS
- Immediate Jeopardy - Why this finding can be disastrous to your facility.
- Free tool: Peer evaluation tool for charge nurse
- Correctly bill ancillary bedside procedures in addition to the room rate
- Searched
