AHIMA: HHS must standardize minimum necessary definition
HCPRO Website, June 24, 2016
HHS must provide a clearer definition of the HIPAA minimum necessary standard, AHIMA president Melissa Martin, RHIA, CCS, CHTS-IM, testified at a subcommittee hearing.
The National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics’ subcommittee on privacy, confidentiality, and security held a hearing June 16 to determine how HHS can improve its guidance on the HIPAA minimum necessary standard. The minimum necessary standard requires covered entities (CE) to use, request, and disclose only the minimum amount of protected health information (PHI) necessary for a given transaction. CEs cannot use, request, or disclose an individual’s entire medical record unless it can justify that the whole record is reasonably needed for a specific purpose.
However, HHS does not currently offer specific guidance on how the standard should be defined and leaves it largely up to the discretion of individual CEs. The lack of a clear, official definition leads to inconsistent minimum necessary standards among CEs and may cause the unnecessary release of PHI, leaving CEs vulnerable to litigation, according to Martin’s testimony. HHS should develop a clear, objective definition of minimum necessary and consider creating different levels of minimum necessary based on specific indicators.
Technological and regulatory shifts since the minimum necessary standard was first implemented present additional challenges, Martin said. Many EHRs lack the controls HIM professionals require to properly restrict access to an individual’s PHI to only the specific staff that need access to it. Most EHRs also lack the sophistication to perform the complicated search and data sequestration functions CEs require.
The shift to mandate improved and increased interoperability and data sharing among healthcare providers adds an additional challenge to defining the minimum necessary, she said. The minimum necessary amount of PHI needed for most uses and requests has increased rather than decreased.
AHIMA conducted a survey on minimum necessary standards prior to the hearing. A plurality (38%) of respondents said they did not know if their organization adopted a definition of minimum necessary for access and disclosure of PHI.
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- CMS seeks comment on quality measures
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- What to include on the incident report
- Code diagnoses and outpatient treatment for PTSD
- Complications from immobility by body system
- Understanding nursing roles in quality improvement
- E-mailed
-
- Patient care orders/protocols: What do the regulations say?
- Refine the terms: Understand unbilled accounts and DNFB
- Q: What are the requirements of an agency's professional advisory committee (PAC)?
- Q/A: Reporting L code and CPT code for splinting
- Q&A: Charging for drug administration during urgent care visit
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Know guidelines and subtle differences in code descriptions for laceration repairs
- Food and drink in patient care areas
- Coding meconium aspiration
- CMS final rule clarifies that medical staff can extend beyond physicians
- Searched
