AHIMA: HHS must standardize minimum necessary definition
HCPRO Website, June 24, 2016
HHS must provide a clearer definition of the HIPAA minimum necessary standard, AHIMA president Melissa Martin, RHIA, CCS, CHTS-IM, testified at a subcommittee hearing.
The National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics’ subcommittee on privacy, confidentiality, and security held a hearing June 16 to determine how HHS can improve its guidance on the HIPAA minimum necessary standard. The minimum necessary standard requires covered entities (CE) to use, request, and disclose only the minimum amount of protected health information (PHI) necessary for a given transaction. CEs cannot use, request, or disclose an individual’s entire medical record unless it can justify that the whole record is reasonably needed for a specific purpose.
However, HHS does not currently offer specific guidance on how the standard should be defined and leaves it largely up to the discretion of individual CEs. The lack of a clear, official definition leads to inconsistent minimum necessary standards among CEs and may cause the unnecessary release of PHI, leaving CEs vulnerable to litigation, according to Martin’s testimony. HHS should develop a clear, objective definition of minimum necessary and consider creating different levels of minimum necessary based on specific indicators.
Technological and regulatory shifts since the minimum necessary standard was first implemented present additional challenges, Martin said. Many EHRs lack the controls HIM professionals require to properly restrict access to an individual’s PHI to only the specific staff that need access to it. Most EHRs also lack the sophistication to perform the complicated search and data sequestration functions CEs require.
The shift to mandate improved and increased interoperability and data sharing among healthcare providers adds an additional challenge to defining the minimum necessary, she said. The minimum necessary amount of PHI needed for most uses and requests has increased rather than decreased.
AHIMA conducted a survey on minimum necessary standards prior to the hearing. A plurality (38%) of respondents said they did not know if their organization adopted a definition of minimum necessary for access and disclosure of PHI.
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Differentiate between types of wound debridement
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Know guidelines and subtle differences in code descriptions for laceration repairs
- Don’t forget the three checks in medication administration
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Reimbursement for Facility and Professional Services in a Provider-Based Department by Gina M. Reese, Esq., RN
- New CMS guidance on ligature risk says Joint Commission recommendations set the bar
- What to include on the incident report
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Maryland health system locked out of network by ransomware
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Packaged vs. bundled services
- Q/A: Correct use of modifier -PT
- Q&A: Why are we getting edits for PET scans?
- New CMS guidance on ligature risk says Joint Commission recommendations set the bar
- Immediate Jeopardy - Why this finding can be disastrous to your facility.
- Fetal non-stress tests represent important part of maternal and fetal health
- Distinguish between revenue codes 637, 250 for SADs
- CMS replaces clinic E/M visit levels with single G-code
- Clearing up the confusion: CPT codes 76376 and 76377
- Clear up confusion surrounding observation services
- Searched