- Home
- » e-Newsletters
Topic: Billing rules for devices can be different for each payer
Ambulatory Surgery Reimbursement Update, November 25, 2008
Medicare significantly changed the way it pays ASCs in 2008, but not all insurers changed. This leaves a lot of confusion, especially when it comes to billing for device-intensive procedures—and getting it wrong can cost you. Most insurers use one of three systems to pay ASCs:
- By groupers (the way Medicare paid in 2007)
- ASC payment system (the way Medicare pays ASCs currently)
- Hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) (the way Medicare pays hospitals currently)
Each system has different rules for how to code services. Knowing which set of rules your payer follows is critical to getting paid correctly.
For spinal cord stimulators and infusion pumps, Medicare now bundles the device payment into the reimbursement under the ambulatory payment classification (APC) system.
“A common mistake that people make under the new ASC payment system is reporting the device code,” says Linda Van Horn, MBA, president and CEO of 21st Century Edge in
For example, when ASCs bill for a spinal cord stimulator lead placement, Medicare wants the ASCs to bill for the procedure only. ASCs should bill CPT code 63650, but not the device code. In addition, if a physician places more than one lead, Medicare does not discount for multiple lead placement. Be sure to bill for each additional lead using the -51 modifier (e.g., code 63650-51.) It’s also a good idea to make sure other insurers who follow Medicare guidelines don’t discount for multiple lead placement.
Payers who use the old grouper system still want ASCs to report the L8680 device code with the CPT code 63650 when billing for spinal cord stimulators lead placement. However, other payers who use the HOPD OPPS require ASCs to report code C1778 with CPT code 63650 for the spinal cord stimulator lead placement.
“This is why there is often confusion about not knowing whether or not to code the device or which HCPCS Level II code to use to report the device,” Van Horn says. “The key is to know which system the payer is using and then report the service under those rules.”
Editor’s note: This topic is from the December 2008 issue of Ambulatory Surgery Coding and Reimbursement Insider.
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- 2010 ICD-9 code updates now available online
- Master modifiers to ensure accurate reimbursement
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- Don’t be scared into silence: Affiliation letter safeguards allow you to disclose more
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Understand the H1N1 Flu and how to code it
- E-mailed
-
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Revised MS.1.20 'huge improvement', out for comment again
- Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations, December 2009
- Hand hygiene rates improved through variety of reinforcement styles
- Press Ganey report: Patient satisfaction increasing across the country
- Residency Program Alert, December 2009
- Searched