- Home
- » e-Newsletters
Topic: Take note of global period for podiatry procedures
Ambulatory Surgery Reimbursement Update, September 23, 2008
Physicians and ASC staff members, especially if they schedule patients, need to know the global period for procedures, says Michael Warshaw, DPM, CPC, FACFAOM, healthcare consultant and practicing podiatrist in Ravenna, OH.
Most, if not all, podiatry procedures performed at an ASC have a 90-day global period, which is the number of postoperative days that the carrier determines you should include in the procedure. “You have to be aware of this because it would directly affect the scheduling of any other procedures you would perform on that patient subsequent to that initial procedure date,” Warshaw says.
For example, Warshaw says, if the physician performs a hammertoe procedure on a patient, and the patient comes back in fewer than 90 days for another procedure, this will affect reimbursement and result in a lower payment for the ASC because the payer would assume this is a secondary procedure. It’s important to note that the 90-day period starts the day before a physician performs a procedure, as opposed to the actual day of the procedure.
In this case, as in others, the proper use of modifiers plays a vital role in reimbursement. If the physician performs a separate, unrelated procedure during that global period, aside from documenting in the medical record that this second procedure is unrelated to the primary procedure, Warshaw says, reporting modifier -79 shows the carrier that the procedures are not related.
When reporting modifier -79, remember that the medical record needs to demonstrate to the carrier that:
- The second procedure was unrelated to the first procedure
- The physician should not have performed the second procedure when he or she performed the initial procedure
Editor’s note: This topic is from the September 2008 issue of Ambulatory Surgery Coding and Reimbursement Insider.
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Guidance and tact key to compliant, effective physician queries
- Searched