- Home
- » e-Newsletters
Tip: What litigants need to know about e-discovery
EHR Connection, July 21, 2008
Discovery, the process by which litigants obtain information held by other parties to a lawsuit, is more complex in the digital age and poses new challenges for HIM personnel as they search all relevant data repositories in response to subpoenas.
Historically, discovery requests pertained to witnesses, documents, and objects. Litigants now also seek the other party’s e-mails, computer hard drives, and backup tapes.
The discovery rules embodied in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which govern civil proceedings in U.S. federal courts, attempt to strike a balance between an open, full process of discovery and protection against unnecessary intrusion into a party’s private files. Recent amendments to the discovery rules that specifically address electronic data don’t create new substantive obligations; they simply adapt existing rules and concepts to electronically stored information.
The e-discovery amendments pertain to:
- Claims of privilege or protection of trial preparation materials
- Planning for discovery
- Production of electronically stored information
- Scheduling and planning
- Failure to disclose electronically stored information
- Subpoenas
This overview of the e-discovery amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is the first in a series from The Practical Guide to Release of Information published by HCPro, Inc. Future issues of EHR Connection will examine the e-discovery amendments in greater detail.
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched