- Home
- » e-Newsletters
ASCs in the news: California agency stops licensing physician-owned ASCs
Ambulatory Surgery Reimbursement Update, June 10, 2008
California ASCs are waiting for the state’s next move, and pondering their own, as the California Department of Public Health (DPH) issues denials for license renewal applications by physician-owned facilities.
A May 15 DPH memorandum from Kathleen Billingsley, RN, deputy director of DPH, is posted on the Web site of the California Ambulatory Surgery Association (CASA). The memorandum explains that a 2007 state appeals court decision (Capen v. Shewry) takes away DPH authority to license physician-owned ASCs. However, the decision leaves DPH with licensing authority over ASCs not owned by physicians.
According to a letter from Astrid Meghrigian, JD, counsel for the California Medical Association (CMA), also posted on the CASA Web site, the CMA strongly objects to the DPH interpretation of the decision. Although the Capen decision was based on the question of DPH’s authority to issue licenses to physician-owned ASCs, and although licensure had been a voluntary process, the letter says the wording of a recent DPH denial indicates physician-owned ASCs are ineligible for licensure. The CMA letter also states some denials advise ASCs that they are ineligible to treat patients in the California Medicaid program, Medi-Cal, if they do not have a license. CMA believes this is contrary to California law.
The letter states that “by reading the Capen decision in such an incorrect manner, the Department [DPH] is voluntarily abdicating its responsibility to license clinics that want to be subject to the Department’s health and safety oversight standards.”
According to the DPH memorandum, ASCs can operate “until this issue is resolved by legislation.”
To view the CASA Web site, click here.
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Guidance and tact key to compliant, effective physician queries
- Searched