- Home
- » e-Newsletters
Data collection needs to bring about change
Quality Improvement Monitor, February 22, 2008
Editor's note: This is the first article in a regular series about how to collect and analyze data.
Don't waste your time collecting data unless it's part of a closed control loop that leads to changes in your hospital.
"The reason we measure data is because data is part of a closed loop, and the reason we have a closed loop is that we want to change something," says Ken Rohde, author of the new book Making Your Data Work: Tools and Templates for Effective Analysis, published by HCPro, Inc., and a senior consultant for The Greeley Company, a division of HCPro in Marblehead, MA. "We either want to change behaviors, or we want to say, 'It's exactly at the right point; let's keep it here,' " he says.
A thermostat that is working properly, he says, is an example of a closed control loop. If the temperature falls below a set point, say the 70oF mark, the thermostat initiates an action, which is to turn on the heaters. The air then warms up and touches the thermostat, which samples the temperature to determine whether the room has reached that set point, or 70oF mark, and turns off the heater if it has.
"That's a closed control loop, and it's got some key parts-it's got the data; it's got the set point, or the expectation; it's got the action; and it's got the closed feedback loop," says Rohde.
In this example, a data loop breakdown may mean that either the thermostat or heater is broken, so even if you keep raising the temperature, the room stays cold. A broken data loop might also result if someone has changed the expectation, set point, or temperature, to, for example, 90oF. The heater then works to reach an expectation that might not be the right one.
Similarly, the board of directors and senior leadership might have different expectations, or set points for medication error rates. Senior leaders need to determine what the expectation is and clearly define it to quality directors, so if the data show performance falling below that set point, the quality department can take action to correct the problem.
Access the full story in the February issue of the Quality Improvement Report; access is free for subscribers, nonsubscribers can purchase a copy of the story for $10./p>
For more information, click here.
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Searched