- Home
- » e-Newsletters
Focus on infections to ensure CMS reimbursement
Quality Improvement Monitor, February 8, 2008
Hospitals that plan to screen every single patient for urinary catheter-associated infections to avoid paying for preventable conditions may want to keep this in mind: The government will be watching.
"Increased use of the present-on-admission [POA] variable is certainly going to occur as it is implemented in states across the country, but what we don't want to see happen is the unintended consequence that there's increase and potentially unnecessary use of diagnostic testing on admission," said Chesley Richards, MD, MPH, FACP, deputy director of the Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion National Center for Preparedness, Detection, and Control of Infectious Diseases for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
"The example we've already been hearing about is people doing unnecessary testing for . . . patients who have catheters but who are not symptomatic with urinary tract infection [UTI] on admission," said Richards, who spoke during a December 2007 HCPro audioconference. "Before diagnosing a UTI, clinical symptoms should be present."
Richards said the CDC also discourages the use of antibiotics as a preventive measure when there is no evidence of infection. "These are the kind of behaviors we want to discourage over time."CMS will monitor these issues as well, according to Thomas Valuck, MD, MHSA, JD, medical officer and senior advisor to Herb Kuhn, acting deputy administrator of CMS.
Access the full story in the February issue of the Quality Improvement Report; access is free for subscribers, nonsubscribers can purchase a copy of the story for $10./p>
For more information, click here.
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Searched