- Home
- » e-Newsletters
California EHR study finds that size does matter
EHR Connection, February 4, 2008
A recent study by the California HealthCare Foundation (CHCF) found that the larger the medical practice, the more likely it is to use EHRs, according to the foundation's January 17 press release.
The study revealed that 79% of Kaiser Permanente physicians in California reported using EHRs. In contrast, only 25% of small/medium practices with fewer than 10 physicians and 13% of solo practitioners reported using EHRs.
Researchers also found that 37% of California physicians use EHRs, which outpaces the national average of 28%.
Other findings include the following facts:
- Most California physicians still prescribe medications with handwritten orders; only one in four routinely uses e-prescribing
- Only 13% of hospitals have fully implemented EHR systems and only 11% are fully using barcoding technology to administer drugs
- Major barriers to EHR adoption by medical groups included cost (59%), difficulty and expense of implementation (42%), uncertainty about selecting the right product (31%), and resistance to changes in practice style (30%)
- More than half of adults expressed interest in the ability to schedule medical appointments online, but 29% were "not at all interested" because of security and confidentiality issues and 39% were "not at all interested" in accessing PHRs online for the same reasons
CHCF describes itself on its Web site as "an independent philanthropy committed to improving the way healthcare is delivered and financed in California."
Click here to read the CHCF press release.
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Searched