- Home
- » e-Newsletters
Premier: P4P could save 70,000 lives per year
Quality Improvement Monitor, February 1, 2008
If all U.S. hospitals were to achieve the three-year cost and mortality improvements found among the CMS/Premier pay-for-performance project participants for pneumonia, heart bypass, heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, and hip and knee replacement patient populations, they could save an estimated 70,000 lives per year and reduce hospital costs by more than $4.5 billion annually.
"Our work with hundreds of hospitals across the nation provides evidence of how the U.S. healthcare system is showing improvements and patients are getting higher quality healthcare," Richard Norling, Premier president and CEO said in a press release issued yesterday. "The findings from this analysis clearly suggest that, through the reliable delivery of basic care processes, improving clinical quality and safely reducing costs is attainable for all hospitals across the country."
The Premier analysis of 1.1 million patient records from participating hospitals encompasses 8.5% of all patients nationally. On average, the median hospital cost per patient for participants in the CMS/Premier pilot declined by more than $1,000 across the first three years of the project, whereas the median mortality rate decreased by 1.87%.
For more information, click here.
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Searched