Bill 36430 regardless of where the patient was admitted
APCs Weekly Monitor, October 12, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
QUESTION: A doctor receives laboratory test results on a post transplant patient. The doctor tells the patient he or she needs a transfusion.
"Patient found to have low Hemoglobin on labs drawn today. Attempted to schedule outpatient transfusion for 4/10/07, but the unit was unable to accommodate. Emergency room triage called and Clinical Decision Unit (CDU) bed management accepted the patient for transfusion of 2 units of leukopoor irradiated blood transfusion."
The patient spends a total of 19 hours in the CDU. The first unit was transfused in two hours and 50 minutes. The second unit transfused in two hours and 25 minutes. The emergency department (ED) coders bill for the CDU.
How should we code this scenario? We follow the ACEP guidelines when billing for ED visits.
ANSWER: Regardless of where the patient was admitted to the ED, outpatient unit, clinic, etc., the doctor saw the patient and treated him or her for a blood transfusion, which should be billed as such. The facility would bill the patient with CPT code 36430 for the transfusion administration regardless of the number of units infused and P9040 x2 for leukopoor red blood cells (RBC) irradiated blood units. Though RBCs was not stated, it is most common. There is no ED or other visit charge, because the patient was already seen and evaluated by his or her doctor prior to the visit to HFHS. Why the patient was in the unit for 19 hours but was only transfused for approximately five hours is unclear. Was there a complication or transfusion reaction? Did the patient have another condition that required treatment? If so, then other procedures and/or visits may apply.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched