Append modifier -52 for reduced service echocardiogram
APCs Weekly Monitor, June 15, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
QUESTION: Our hospital performed an echocardiogram on a patient; however, the physician dictated that "the study was technically very difficult, and no meaningful information could be obtained."
Our department wants to charge for the time and images obtained, but we're not sure if we should charge a limited amount in this instance since the physician dictated the above information. We were contemplating charging a limited amount and appending modifier -52 (reduced services). Do you have any suggestions on how to handle this scenario?
ANSWER: In this circumstance it may be appropriate to charge for the imaging with the addition of a modifier. You may report modifier -52 when certain services are partially reduced or eliminated at the physician's discretion. Since the service was technically provided, even though the result was inadequate to make a diagnostic statement, it is correct to code for the service.
You should also query the physician to determine whether the exam was technically a full/complete exam versus a limited exam, since it may not be apparent from the body of the dictated report. The code assignments differ for a complete exam versus a limited exam and you should assign the most appropriate code.
Under the OPPS, you may append modifier -52 to indicate partial reduction or discontinuation of radiology procedures or other services that do not require anesthesia. Your hospital will receive 50% of the APC reimbursement for the procedure appended with modifier -52.
(Source: American Medical Association CPT 2007 Professional Edition, p. 440).
(This answer appeared in the July 2007 APC Answer Letter).
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q&A tackles coding questions about injections and infusions
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched