Do not report 51701 with P9612 for specimen collection
APCs Weekly Monitor, February 16, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Do not report 51701 with P9612 for specimen collection
QUESTION: When staff catheterize a patient for specimen collection only, can you report both 51701 (Insertion of non-indwelling bladder catheter) and P9612 (Catheterization for collection of specimen, single patient, all places of service)?
ANSWER: No. The Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 16, section 60 (Manual 100-04) states the following:
In addition to the amounts provided under the fee schedule, the Secretary shall provide for and establish a nominal fee to cover the appropriate costs of collecting the sample on which a clinical laboratory test was performed and for which payment is made with respect to samples collected in the same encounter. A specimen collection fee is allowed in circumstances such as drawing a blood sample through venipuncture (i.e. inserting into a vein a needle with syringe or vacutainer to draw the specimen) or collecting a urine sample by catheterization.
Note that the specimen collection fee associated with P9612 (status indicator A, paid under the lab fee schedule) involves a "nominal" amount of $3.00, whereas the 2007 national payment for 51701 (APC 0340, status indicator X) is $37.51. If staff perform the catheterization only for collection of a urine specimen, report P9612. If staff perform the catheterization for a diagnostic or therapeutic reason, such as checking for residual urine, and then remove the catheter, report 51701.
Frequently, staff may collect a urine specimen while performing the service associated with 51701. However, do not bill P9612 with 51701. According to current CCI edits, P9612 is a component of Column 1 code 51701, and you cannot bill them together using any modifier.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched