Do not report 51701 with P9612 for specimen collection
APCs Insider, February 16, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Insider!
Do not report 51701 with P9612 for specimen collection
QUESTION: When staff catheterize a patient for specimen collection only, can you report both 51701 (Insertion of non-indwelling bladder catheter) and P9612 (Catheterization for collection of specimen, single patient, all places of service)?
ANSWER: No. The Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 16, section 60 (Manual 100-04) states the following:
In addition to the amounts provided under the fee schedule, the Secretary shall provide for and establish a nominal fee to cover the appropriate costs of collecting the sample on which a clinical laboratory test was performed and for which payment is made with respect to samples collected in the same encounter. A specimen collection fee is allowed in circumstances such as drawing a blood sample through venipuncture (i.e. inserting into a vein a needle with syringe or vacutainer to draw the specimen) or collecting a urine sample by catheterization.
Note that the specimen collection fee associated with P9612 (status indicator A, paid under the lab fee schedule) involves a "nominal" amount of $3.00, whereas the 2007 national payment for 51701 (APC 0340, status indicator X) is $37.51. If staff perform the catheterization only for collection of a urine specimen, report P9612. If staff perform the catheterization for a diagnostic or therapeutic reason, such as checking for residual urine, and then remove the catheter, report 51701.
Frequently, staff may collect a urine specimen while performing the service associated with 51701. However, do not bill P9612 with 51701. According to current CCI edits, P9612 is a component of Column 1 code 51701, and you cannot bill them together using any modifier.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Insider!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Note from Hugh
- Depressing Leapfrog scores haunt hospitals
- Q/A: How should we report irradiated blood products?
- 2014 SNF Proposed Rule Analysis: Revising and rebasing the SNF market basket
- Recent Recovery Auditor activity
- Advanced practice nurses shouldn’t be left behind in meaningful use journey
- Reminder: MDS correction policy to be updated effective May 19
- Ask the expert: BIMS assessment
- Report: Nearly 10 percent of patients have C.diff at admission
- CMS issues transmittal to update the Medicare Provider Reimbursement Manual
- E-mailed
-
- Georgia hospitals scrambling to create residency positions
- Q/A: How should we report irradiated blood products?
- CMS looking for comments on molecular pathology payments
- Tip of the week: Build a successful website to impress candidates
- Applying multiple procedure payment reductions to therapy cap amounts for Critical Access Hospital (CAH) claims
- Don't burn those ICD-9-CM Manuals just yet
- Joint Commission seeks input on behavioral health home certification
- Report: Nearly 10 percent of patients have C.diff at admission
- Depressing Leapfrog scores haunt hospitals
- HCA initiative boosts flu shots among hospital workers
- Searched
