Report direct 24-hour observation admit with G0379 x1, G0378 x24
APCs Weekly Monitor, February 24, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Report direct 24-hour observation admit with G0379 x1, G0378 x24
QUESTION: Our staff have discussed how to report new observation codes G0378 and G0379, but we remain confused. If we have a direct admission to observation for 24 hours, how do we report the service? Which of the following is correct?
Is G0379 an add-on code or is it included in the total time?
ANSWER: Your first scenario is the correct way to bill this encounter: Bill one unit of G0379 and 24 units of G0378. The one unit of G0379 represents more of an E/M-type service that is provided when the patient is directly admitted to observation.
The payment for this code, if it qualifies via the OCE, covers the facility costs related to placing the patient directly in observation (registration, nursing overhead/evaluation related to the initial services provided, etc.).
G0379 indicates to Medicare that the patient arrived as a direct admit, but it does not count as the first hour. G0378, on the other hand, tells Medicare how long the patient stayed in observation. Think of G0378 (not G0379) as your time-based code. Every time you report G0379, include a line item for G0378-even if the patient is only directly admitted to observation for one hour.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched