Do not append modifier -25 to a drug administration claim for a patient with a prescription
APCs Weekly Monitor, September 23, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Do not append modifier -25 to a drug administration claim for a patient with a prescription
QUESTION: Is it appropriate to append modifier -25 to an E/M level in conjunction with the administration injections/infusion codes (90780-90781, 90465-90472, 90782-90799, and 96400-96549) when a patient presents as an outpatient with a prescription for his or her injection from their physician, and an RN administers the drug in the outpatient infusion department?
ANSWER: No. CMS has indicated that if you perform "a significant separately identifiable" evaluation and management (E/M) service, you should report the appropriate E/M service code with modifier -25 in addition to codes G0355-G0363, 96405-96406, 96420-96520, 96530-96549.
In your example the provider does not perform a separate and identifiable service. The basic assessment and monitoring of the patient post injection/infusion is inherent in the procedure. Vital signs and basic monitoring do not constitute a separate E/M visit.
Here is an example of when to appropriately append modifier -25: A patient presents for another complaint/service and a physician adminsters a medically necessary injection/infusion as a result. In this scenario, assign both an E/M and the appropriate injection/infusion code. Append modifier -25 to the E/M code.
We recommend you stick with the original OCE edit 21 in which a medical visit (status indicator V) will reject a status indicator S or T procedure performed on the same day without the presence of modifier -25.
Transmittal 129 ("2005 Drug Administration Coding Revisions"), available here: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/manuals/pm_trans/R129OTN.pdf on the CMS Web site, explains this scenario.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- 2010 ICD-9 code updates now available online
- Master modifiers to ensure accurate reimbursement
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- Don’t be scared into silence: Affiliation letter safeguards allow you to disclose more
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Understand the H1N1 Flu and how to code it
- E-mailed
-
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- Revised MS.1.20 'huge improvement', out for comment again
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations, December 2009
- Hand hygiene rates improved through variety of reinforcement styles
- Press Ganey report: Patient satisfaction increasing across the country
- Residency Program Alert, December 2009
- Searched
