Do not append modifier -25 to a drug administration claim for a patient with a prescription
APCs Weekly Monitor, September 23, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Do not append modifier -25 to a drug administration claim for a patient with a prescription
QUESTION: Is it appropriate to append modifier -25 to an E/M level in conjunction with the administration injections/infusion codes (90780-90781, 90465-90472, 90782-90799, and 96400-96549) when a patient presents as an outpatient with a prescription for his or her injection from their physician, and an RN administers the drug in the outpatient infusion department?
ANSWER: No. CMS has indicated that if you perform "a significant separately identifiable" evaluation and management (E/M) service, you should report the appropriate E/M service code with modifier -25 in addition to codes G0355-G0363, 96405-96406, 96420-96520, 96530-96549.
In your example the provider does not perform a separate and identifiable service. The basic assessment and monitoring of the patient post injection/infusion is inherent in the procedure. Vital signs and basic monitoring do not constitute a separate E/M visit.
Here is an example of when to appropriately append modifier -25: A patient presents for another complaint/service and a physician adminsters a medically necessary injection/infusion as a result. In this scenario, assign both an E/M and the appropriate injection/infusion code. Append modifier -25 to the E/M code.
We recommend you stick with the original OCE edit 21 in which a medical visit (status indicator V) will reject a status indicator S or T procedure performed on the same day without the presence of modifier -25.
Transmittal 129 ("2005 Drug Administration Coding Revisions"), available here: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/manuals/pm_trans/R129OTN.pdf on the CMS Web site, explains this scenario.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Guidance and tact key to compliant, effective physician queries
- Searched