What should we do if we are unable to properly inform the patient of the "opt-out" of the facility directory due to the patient's condition?
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, September 12, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
The regulations provide that if you cannot practically provide the opportunity to opt-out of the facility directory listing due to the patient's incapacity or emergency treatment situation, you may use/disclose some or all of the allowed information if such use/disclosure is consistent with a prior expressed preference of the patient that is known to your facility, or if you consider such use/disclosure in the best interest of the patient. In these cases, inform the patient of the use/disclosure as soon as it is practical to do so.
The commentary to the rule encourages you to take the following into account when deciding whether to include some or all of the patient information in the directory:
- Whether disclosing that an individual is in the facility could reasonably cause harm or danger to the individual (e.g., if it appeared that an unconscious patient had been abused and disclosing the information could give the attacker sufficient information to seek out the person and repeat the abuse)
- Whether disclosing a patient's location within a facility implicitly would give information about the patient's condition (e.g., whether a patient's room number revealed that he or she was in a psychiatric ward)
- Whether it is necessary or appropriate to give information about patient status to family or friends (e.g., if giving information to a family member about an unconscious patient could help a physician administer appropriate medications)
- Whether an individual had, prior to becoming incapacitated, expressed a preference not to be included in the directory
Go to Section 164.510(a) Use and Disclosure for Facility Directories of the Bricker & Eckler Web site for more information.
Editor's note: Attorneys from Bricker & Eckler, LLP, answered this question. This is not legal advice. Consult with your attorney for legal matters.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched