Should I consider encrypting the hard drives of all my systems to ensure the safety of electronic PHI everywhere it may reside?
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, August 15, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
It would certainly be ideal to have such strong security everywhere electronic PHI (ePHI) is stored, but it's simply not realistic. If you've established that your systems are vulnerable (and I've yet to find any that aren't), go for your highest-payoff systems first. This is likely laptop computers and file and database servers that have limited physical security. Encrypting the drive of every single computer is probably not necessary, especially if you have reasonable and layered building security.
If you're going to encrypt drives, buy enterprise-level software such as that offered by PGP Corporation (www.pgp.com) that's easier to deploy, instead of using the less-scalable data-encryption solutions built into current operating systems. Keep in mind that commercial-grade drive encryption software costs money and requires some administration, but it can save serious effort and money in the long run.
This is especially true for software that encrypts the entire hard drive. Time and time again, I see users storing ePHI any place on a drive other than folders encrypted for ePHI storage. Sometimes this is intentional for the sake of convenience (such as storing files on the desktop), but other times it's unintentional, since many operating systems and applications store software in temporary directories and other default locations about which you may not be aware.
Editor's note: Kevin Beaver of Principle Logic answered this question. This is not legal advice. Consult your attorney for legal matters.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched