Clarifying status indicator ’S’ and ’T’ procedures
APCs Weekly Monitor, July 7, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Clarifying status indicator 'S' and 'T' procedures
Q: We have a question about Medicare status indicators and procedure discounting. If a claim contains two APCs, one of which has a status indicator 'S', and the other has a status indicator 'T', is either one discounted? What if the 'T' status APC has a higher weight?
If both are 'T' or both 'S', which one is discounted? Will a discount apply only if there are multiple APCs with a status indicator 'T'? We have searched the CMS Web site, but cannot find a definitive answer.
A: You can find the answer to your question in the 'S' and 'T' status indicator descriptions. Status indicator 'S' represents a significant procedure, and is not discounted when you report multiple CPT codes that group to APCs with multiple 'S' status indicators. Status indicator 'T' is also a significant procedure, but multiple procedure reduction applies.
To answer your specific questions, if there are only two APCs present on a claim (i.e., an ED claim with 12001-59, which has a status indicator of 'T', and 29105-LT, which has a status indicator 'S'), the outpatient code editor identifies both with respective relative weights and status indictators, and both are reimbursed at 100% of APC payment. Neither are discounted because of the singular status indicators reported on the claim.
If both CPT codes group to status indicator 'S' procedures (i.e. CT scans), then neither is discounted under OPPS and both are paid 100% of APC payment. Remember that in some cases, medical necessity applies before APC payment is made.
If both CPT codes have a 'T' status indicator, the one with the highest relative weight will be paid at 100% APC payment. Any additional procedures with a status indicator 'T' will be discounted 50% of their APC payment. Remember that with status indicator 'T', there is no limit the number of CPT codes that you can report, as long as you follow CPT rules and guidelines and include complete medical record documentation.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched