Do not include 73140 in E/M point system
APCs Weekly Monitor, June 17, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Do not include 73140 in E/M point system
QUESTION: We are a hospital-based urgent care clinic. Our nurses have their imaging tech licenses. They perform simple x-rays, such has hand, finger, chest, etc. Sometimes the PA assists the nurses by treating the patients.
Since there is a charge for the x-ray--e.g., CPT 73140 for x-ray of the fingers--can the nurses also include "X-rays by RN: 20 points" in their level of care point system? Generally, we don't include any procedures that generate charges included on the acuity tool that creates the "level of service" or "E/M level" for the facility. Can we consider x-rays procedures in the same vein as suturing and splinting?
ANSWER: Do not include separately billed and paid procedures in your facility's guidelines when determining E/M levels of care. CMS stated in the November 1, 2002 Final Rule, "We believe that, within constraints of clinical care and management protocols, the level of service for emergency and clinic visits should be determined by resource consumption that is not otherwise separately payable."
While CMS has not defined a national facility E/M coding system, their intent on this issue seems clear. In your example, if a patient meets the criteria for a 99282 visit, and you also allow "X-rays by RN: 20 points" in the level of care point system, this may cause the E/M level to move up to a 99283. If your hospital also bills the X-ray and is paid an APC for the X-ray, as well as the higher APC payment for the 99283, this could be construed as "double counting" the X-ray.
As a best practice, include those services that consume resources, but are not separately paid in addition to the visit E/M level in your level of care system.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched