Master modifier -25 use
HIM Connection, March 29, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Modifier -25 (significant, separately identifiable E/M service) accounted for $1.7 billion of E/M charges billed to Medicare, causing the OIG to include this in its 2005 Work Plan.
Editing software rejects claims that include procedure charges with E/M levels. But modifier -25 bypasses those edits, allowing facilities to receive payment for those claims and overstep the true intent of the modifier-to provide payment for hospitals that legitimately supply a significant, separately identifiable E/M service in addition to the procedure.
Too many hospitals bypass the edit by appending modifier -25 inappropriately, says Keith Siddel, MBA, PhD (c), president and CEO of HRM, a national healthcare financial service organization in Creede, CO.
"Providers are saying, '[Because] most of the time you need it, it becomes easier to add it to every claim and remove it when it's not needed,' " Siddel says. This has become standard practice over time.
Hospitals that report modifier -25 all the time are the most likely targets of an OIG audit, "but everybody should look at the way modifier -25 is being applied," Siddel says. Follow these tips to ensure appropriate use:
- Verify that your coders apply modifier -25 based on the patient's reason for requesting services, not just to process the claim through editing software.
- Revamp and redesign processes that allow the assignment of modifier -25 only to receive a claim payment. Stop automatically hardcoding it to every claim and remove it from your chargemaster.
- Append the modifier just as you would every other modifier, "based on the medical record documentation, which should support the reason the patient requested services," Siddel says.
Don't overreact and stop using modifier -25 altogether, he adds. It is designed for regular use, on perhaps as many as half of all submitted claims.
This excerpt is adapted from Briefings on APCs.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched