OCR posts two new HIPAA FAQs
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, March 14, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) posted on its Web site Tuesday two new frequently asked questions (FAQs). One discusses requirements regarding sharing PHI with an interpreter; the other allowances for responding to a National Medical Support Notice (NMSM).
According to the OCR, healthcare providers do not need patient authorization to disclose PHI to interpreters when
- the interpreter is part of the provider workforce
- the covered entity engages the services of the interpreter as a business associate
- the interpreter is a family member, close friend, or other person designated by the patient as the interpreter for a particular healthcare encounter
In response to the NMSM question, the OCR responded that the privacy rule permits health plans to provide PHI to state child support enforcement agencies in response to an NMSM. This form constitutes a written request for PHI by a law enforcement agency. The NMSM must either include or be accompanied by written assurances from the law enforcement official that
- the requested PHI is material and relevant to a legitimate law enforcement inquiry
- the request is specific and limited in scope
- deidentified information cannot reasonably be used
The covered entity must verify the identity and authority of the public official making the request, and limit the disclosures to the minimum necessary for the purpose. Go to the OCR Web site and click on "What's new" for complete information on these FAQs.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Joint Commission Center announces handoff communication solutions
- Inside best practice: Reduce patient falls with a stoplight
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Searched