GAO looks at first-year experiences under privacy rule
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, October 18, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
For most providers and healthcare plans, first-year implementation of the privacy rule regulations went more smoothly than expected, according to the Government Accountability Office (GAO). The GAO interviewed officials from 23 national organizations representing healthcare consumers, providers, health plans, state officials, public health agencies, researchers, privacy professionals, and a healthcare accrediting body.
Providers and health plans reported that procedures to meet privacy regs have become routine for their staff. However, they still have difficulty with accounting of disclosures and the business associate agreement requirement, according to the GAO's report.
Organizations such as state health departments and research groups complain that the privacy rule hinders the flow of information and impedes their processes. The general public also still knows little about their rights under this rule, evidenced by the nearly 6,000 complaints to the Office of Civil Rights, half of which fell outside the scope of HIPAA or did not describe a true violation.
As a result of the findings, the GAO recommends that the Department of Health and Human Services does the following:
- Inform patients of mandatory disclosures to public health authorities in privacy notices and exempt such disclosures from the accounting requirement
- Conduct a public information campaign to educate patients about their rights and more effectively disseminate information about the rule
Go to the GAO Web site to read the full report.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched