FDA-approved implantable chip raises privacy concerns
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, October 18, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Wednesday approved an implantable chip that could provide easy, immediate access to patient medical records, reported the New York Times. Healthcare professionals would use handheld scanners to read a number on the chip. When plugged into a computer, the number would link to a secure database containing patient-approved healthcare information.
The VeriChip is inserted in the upper arm in a painless, quick procedure, according to Applied Digital Solutions, which manufactures the device. The chip is approximately the size of a grain of rice and invisible to the naked eye once implanted.
Privacy advocates have voiced concerns about the implications of such a tool. Some worry that the speed of the transfer will make it difficult to keep the information secure. Others worry that you cannot remove the chip once it's implanted.
"The fact that we're engaged in such a deep, fundamental privacy debate really does complicate the prospect for this kind of technology," Clyde Wayne Crews, director of technology studies at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, told the Times. "We haven't even sorted out the appropriateness of a [radio frequency identification] tag that goes on a pallet of tomatoes much less one that can go under a person's skin."
Go to Applied Digital Solution's Web site for more information.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched