Workers’ comp codes status B
APCs Weekly Monitor, September 3, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
QUESTION: One of my physicians brought me an article regarding CPT codes for workers' compensation, which suggested we should be using codes 99455 and 99456. These codes also have a higher fee than a regular office visit. Should we change our chargemaster to reflect this instruction?
ANSWER: CPT codes 99455 and 99456, listed below, are identified with status indicator B, "codes that are not recognized by OPPS when submitted on an outpatient hospital part B bill type (12X, 13X, and 14X)."
- 99455-work-related or medical disability examination by the treating physician that includes: completion of a medical history commensurate with the patient's condition; performance of an examination commensurate with the patient's condition; formulation of a diagnosis, assessment of capabilities and stability, and calculation of impairment; development of future medical treatment plan; and completion of necessary documentation/certificates and report
- 99456-work-related or medical disability examination by other than the treating physician that includes: completion of a medical history commensurate with the patient's condition; performance of an examination commensurate with the patient's condition; formulation of a diagnosis, assessment of capabilities and stability, and calculation of impairment; development of future medical treatment plan; and completion of necessary documentation/certificates and report
Both appear to be carrier-specific CPT codes reserved for physician use only. Use of both codes is generally at the discretion of a workers' compensation carrier, such as for an independent medical exam (IME) to determine a disability. The heading in the 2004 CPT book states that these codes are special E/M services, not your typical E/M services, so hospitals should work closely with carriers to determine the appropriate CPT codes to report. For more information, see the 8/16/04 Federal Register.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Tip of the Week: Treat faculty orientation like resident orientation
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: New device pass-through categories
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- News and briefs: GA may increase residency number s across state, but cut main hospital?s budget
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Tip: Know the common bunionectomy procedure codes and how to use them
- Code changes should help ease the pain when coding for facet joint injections
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- News and briefs: UA study links lack of empathy in residents to long shifts
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Don't let improper discharge disposition codes fly under the radar at your facility
- Discharge Planning Under the MDS 3.0
- Correctly code for new cardiac, pulmonary rehab benefits
- Searched