Consultation v. visit: Know the difference
HIM Connection, May 18, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
A consultation is a type of E/M service provided when one physician or appropriate nonphysician practitioner requests that another practitioner provide his or her opinion or advice regarding evaluation or management of a specific problem. The request for consultation can be verbal or in writing, but must be documented in the patient's medical record.
The consulting physician must provide a written report that becomes part of the medical record and a copy must be sent to the requesting physician. As with all documentation, this report must also include the date of the consultation. If the consultation is initiated and the patient wants a second opinion, the consultation E/M codes should not be billed. Consultations do not have a designation of "new" or "established patient," but are designated as either inpatient or outpatient.
Consultations are distinguishable from visits. Medicare pays for consultations regardless of any treatment initiated by the consultant, unless a transfer of care occurs. A transfer of care occurs when the referring physician transfers the responsibility for the patient's complete care to the receiving physician at the time of referral, and the receiving physician documents approval of care in advance.
Examples that do not satisfy the criteria for consultations include the following:
- Standing orders in the medical record for consultations
- No order written for a consultation
- No written report of a consultation
- After hours, an attending physician sends her patient to the emergency room where she meets the patient and performs an E/M service. The emergency room physician does not see the patient. The attending physician should bill the appropriate level of emergency department service and not a consultation.
This week's excerpt is adapted from the "Compliance Troubleshooter: Tackling the top 10 compliance challenges." Click here to order or learn more.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched