Scheduled care in the ED
APCs Weekly Monitor, April 23, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
QUESTION: When we have patients coming to the ED for scheduled care, such as IV antibiotics, should the nurses add an E/M charge to the visit? The ED physician typically does not see these patients, but the nurse obtains a set of vitals, flushes the line, starts the medication, observes the patient, and documents including some type of discharge instructions. The patient is charged a fee for the IV therapy, but what about the nursing care involved?
ANSWER: Patients seen in the ED are not typically scheduled in advance. However, some facilities must use the ED to accommodate after-hours patients. In other instances, the ED may accommodate overflow clinic patients or may be primarily responsible for administering minor procedures in the absence of a clinic. When patients are seen in the ED for a scheduled procedure, they must have a valid order for services. The patient should be registered as a clinic patient because his or her visit is not deemed an emergency. Medical-necessity rules apply and the hospital should screen the procedure and diagnosis.
Because the patient is presenting to the ED for services, Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) regulations apply. The facility may either perform an EMTALA screening for these patients or have patients sign a document indicating they are not there for emergency services.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is aware that nursing services, supplies, and space are provided to the patient during a procedure. When APCs were designed, CMS considered these costs in the reimbursement calculation. This means that the reimbursement for procedures such as IV infusion (Q0081) include the observation time, vital signs monitoring, supplies, and other resources associated with providing this service. It would be inappropriate to charge an E/M visit charge in addition to the procedure charge.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched