Two stents in the same vessel
APCs Weekly Monitor, February 23, 2004
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
QUESTION: This question pertains to Medicare HCPCS code G0290, for insertion of a drug-eluting stent. When a drug-eluting stent is inserted in a coronary vessel (RC or LC or LD) and a bare-metal stent is also inserted in the same vessel, can you code both? Or are you limited to use of one stent code per coronary vessel, which would have to be the G code for the drug-eluting stent?
ANSWER:One code, G0290, should be reported with the appropriate modifier to indicate the artery (LC, LD, RC). G0290 represents the work of inserting the eluting stent. The description of the code states "stent(s)," so, according to this CPT directive, it would not matter how many stent(s) are inserted in the same vessel.
The HCPCS code structure allows for additional coding only if the additional stent is in an additional vessel. If we ignore for the moment that one stent is drug-eluting and one is not, the question becomes can you code two stents for the same vessel? The answer is no. Therefore, by extension, the answer to this question is "one code."
If you code both G0290 and 92980 for this situation, you get OCE edit 20; Column1/Column 2 CCI edit "not mitigated by modifier." Also, the provider would charge for both stents, which means a possible outlier trigger. Do not use 92981 either because it's an add-on code indicating that a non-drug-eluting coronary stent was placed in an additional vessel.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched